Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id d4992e93-054c-b2e1-a627-827bba92050e@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL  (Paul Hughes <paul@vivation.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL  (Paul Hughes <paul@vivation.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 05/09/2017 01:00 PM, Paul Hughes wrote:
> Thank you all for taking the time to answer my questions. I've been out
> of the programming world for a long time, so I am back to being a
> newbie. I was told this is the place for newcomers to ask questions. I
> apologize if my questions did not contain the necessary sophistication
> or nuance for some to answer.

It has more to do with making unsubstantiated assertions, namely:

"I noticed that most of the largest web platforms that use PostgreSQL as
their primary database, also use Python as their primary back-end
language. ..."

Many on this list(myself included) will want to know how you came to
that conclusion and I am speaking as someone who uses Python, Django and
Postgres.

>
> George, your answer makes the most sense. Thank you!  You said:
>
>>>Most cloud servers come preconfigured with some variation of either
> the "LAMP" or "LAPP" stack: i.e. Linux, Apache, MySQL or Postgresql,
> PHP or Python.
>
>>>There needs to be a compelling *application* reason to install
> something else: a JVM (or Apache-Tomcat vs regular Apache),
> Ruby/Rails, Groovy/Grails, etc.
>
>
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jan de Visser
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Upgrading postgresql minor version
Next
From: Ron Ben
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Upgrading postgresql minor version