Re: Gaps in PK sequence numbers - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rich Shepard
Subject Re: Gaps in PK sequence numbers
Date
Msg-id d44076fc-fcd7-445c-da76-5d87c7d2dc4@appl-ecosys.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Gaps in PK sequence numbers  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024, David G. Johnston wrote:

> For efficiency the only thing used to determine the next value of a
> sequence is the stored value of the last sequence value issued. Where that
> value may have been used, in a table as a PK or some other purpose, does
> not enter into it. Using a sequence as a default does indeed become
> problematic if you don't use it exclusively. If you do use it exclusively
> usually you just set the last value to be the maximum needed and use it
> going forward. The numbers from deleted rows simply remain missing in the
> table.

David,

Thanks for the explanation. I had entered PKs without using the sequence.

Regards,

Rich



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rich Shepard
Date:
Subject: Re: Gaps in PK sequence numbers [RESOLVED]
Next
From: Christophe Pettus
Date:
Subject: Re: Gaps in PK sequence numbers [RESOLVED]