Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP
Date
Msg-id d3cab588-dcb1-c9fa-71cb-4e558eff08d6@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/01/17 18:32, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/11/17 3:29 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Okay, looking into my notes, I originally did this because we did not
>> allow adding tables without pkeys to publications which effectively
>> prohibited FOR ALL TABLES publication from working because of
>> information_schema without this. Since this is no longer the case I
>> think it's safe to skip the FirstNormalObjectId check.
> 
> Wouldn't that mean that FOR ALL TABLES replicates the tables from
> information_schema?
> 

Yes, as they are not catalog tables, I thought that was your point.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP