Re: Building from source vs RPMs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Mead
Subject Re: Building from source vs RPMs
Date
Msg-id d3ab2ec80907290551h21181a03ie1fa61af621ba8c0@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Building from source vs RPMs  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general


On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 02:53:19 Christophe Pettus wrote:
> I'm moving from a long time in BSD-land to using Linux.  I've always
> been in the habit of building PostgreSQL from the source tarballs.  On
> Linux, is there an advantage either way to using the RPMs as opposed
> to building from source?  Thanks!

Just to offer another opinion,  source compiles are much easier to control, you're not subject to the author's feelings on certain options.  Also, RPMs usually over-write a version of PG when you upgrade, so you can't run multiple versions side-by-side, and upgrading becomes tougher (unless you have a second box that is).

Just my 2 cents.

--Scott

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: mzhang@ilww.com
Date:
Subject: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: PANIC: could not write to log file 6
Next
From: Jasen Betts
Date:
Subject: Re: Clients disconnect but query still runs