On 11-09-2018 16:47, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> On 08-09-2018 16:03, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> Hello Marina,
>> I'd insist in a comment that "cnt" does not include "skipped"
>> transactions
>> (anymore).
>
> If you mean CState.cnt I'm not sure if this is practically useful
> because the code uses only the sum of all client transactions
> including skipped and failed... Maybe we can rename this field to
> nxacts or total_cnt?
Sorry, I misread your proposal for the first time. Ok!
--
Marina Polyakova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
