Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process
Date
Msg-id d12686c6-7566-8190-8fb0-af4927e8e4fe@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-02-17 18:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-02-03 13:47, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Comment:
>>
>> - It'd be good to split out the feature independent refactorings, like
>>     the introduction of InitControlFile(), into their own commit. Right
>>     now it's hard to separate out what should just should be moved code,
>>     and what should be behavioural changes. Especially when there's stuff
>>     like just reindenting comments as part of the patch.
> 
> Agreed.  Here are three refactoring patches extracted that seem useful
> on their own.

These have been committed.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: reindex concurrently and two toast indexes
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Function to track shmem reinit time