Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Date
Msg-id d0a4f263-a774-394d-134f-4edce6a980e4@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/2/22 1:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Given this appears to be resolved, I have removed this from "Open
>> Items". Thanks!
> 
> Sadly, we're still not out of the woods.  I see three buildfarm
> failures in this test since Robert resolved the "-X" problem [1][2][3]:
> 
> Not sure what to make of this, except that maybe the test is telling
> us about an actual bug of exactly the kind it's designed to expose.

Looking at the test code, is there anything that could have changed the 
relfrozenxid or relminxid independently of the test on these systems?

That said, I do think we should reopen the item to figure out what's 
going on. Doing so now.

Jonathan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade