On 2017/06/16 21:29, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On 2017/06/16 19:26, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> That issue has not been addressed. The reason stated was that it would
>> make code complicated. But I have not had chance to look at how
>> complicated would be and assess myself whether that's worth the
>> trouble.
> I have to admit that what I proposed upthread is a quick-and-dirty
> kluge. One thing I thought to address your concern was to move
> rewriteTargetListUD entirely from the rewriter to the planner when doing
> inherited UPDATE/DELETE, but I'm not sure that's a good idea, because at
> least I think that would need a lot more changes to the rewriter.
I'll have second thought about this, so I'll mark this as waiting on author.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
