Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 3/15/26 23:47, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 3/12/26 00:56, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> * The change to XLOG_CHECKPOINT_REDO to move the wal_level into a proper record
>>   structure should be pulled out as a 0001 patch as it's an cleanup that has
>>   value on its own.
> 
> Makes sense, but it's going to be harder because since d774072f0040 all
> 4 bits in XLR_INFO are used.
> 

Correction. This is not a problem for the XLOG_CHECKPOINT_REDO patch,
but for adding XLOG_CHECKSUMS. I guess we'll need a second xlog rmgr.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra