On 09/17/2018 07:38 AM, still Learner wrote:
Hi ,
I have a 10 TB size table with multiple bytea columns (image & doc)and makes 20TB of DB size. I have a couple of issues to maintain the DB.
1. I Would like to separate the image column from the 10TB size table, place it in a separate schema. The change should not result in any query change in the application. Is it possible? Doing this it should not affect the performance.
That's called "vertical partitioning", which I don't think Postgres supports.
2. I can't maintain files on File system as the count is huge,
Eh?
You aren't supposed to maintain the files on the filesystem;
Postgres is.
so thinking of using any no-sql mostly mongo-DB, is it recommended? Or PostgreSQL itself can handle?
3. Taking the backup of 20TB data, is big task. Any more feasible solution other than online backup/pg_dump?
pgbackrest and barman are popular options.
(We have a database like yours, though only 3TB, and have found that pg_dump runs a
lot faster with "--compress=0". The backups are 2.25x larger than the database, though...)
Each image retrieval is
Currently, we are on pg 9.4 and moving to 10.5 soon.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
