Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From William Yu
Subject Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
Date
Msg-id crc87h$2ehh$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
List pgsql-performance
Dave Cramer wrote:

>
>
> William Yu wrote:
>
>> amrit@health2.moph.go.th wrote:
>>
>>> I will try to reduce shared buffer to 1536 [1.87 Mb].
>>
>>
>>
>> 1536 is probaby too low. I've tested a bunch of different settings on
>> my  8GB Opteron server and 10K seems to be the best setting.
>
>
> Be careful here, he is not using opterons which can access physical
> memory above 4G efficiently. Also he only has 4G the 6-10% rule still
> applies

10% of 4GB is 400MB. 10K buffers is 80MB. Easily less than the 6-10% rule.


>> To figure out your effective cache size, run top and add free+cached.
>
>
> My understanding is that effective cache is the sum of shared buffers,
> plus kernel buffers, not sure what free + cached gives you?

Not true. Effective cache size is the free memory available that the OS
can use for caching for Postgres. In a system that runs nothing but
Postgres, it's free + cached.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Madison Kelly
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware purchase question
Next
From: Madison Kelly
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware purchase question