Tom Lane writes:
> Please provide a self-contained test case for this. In testing here,
> 8.4 can still figure out that it ought to use an indexscan against the
> large table ... so there is some aspect of your tables that you're not
> showing us.
It is possible, and very likely, that it is an issue with the distribution
of values.
The data is 40GB+ and the largest table is 200M+ rows..
Setting a standalone setup may be difficult, but what we could do is
something like webex where you, or someone else we would trust, would
connect to a web conference and tell us what to type.
