Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Date
Msg-id cfaba5ddde12235beede88cb2ead315cda98c514.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 07:34 +0000, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> I noticed that this message should cover both archive recovery modes,
> which means in recovery mode and standby mode. Then, I combined your
> suggestion above with this point of view. Have a look at the updated patch.
> I also enriched the new tap tests to show this perspective.

Looks good, thanks.

I'll mark this patch as "ready for committer".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: pg_class.reltype -> pg_type.oid missing for pg_toast table