On Mon, 2026-02-16 at 16:09 +0530, yudhi s wrote:
> I have updated the plan below. While trying to replace actual binds and
> the objects with sample names some lines got missed initially it seems.
>
> https://gist.github.com/databasetech0073/f564ac23ee35d1f0413980fe4d00efa9
Thanks.
Does the filter on "due_date" eliminate many rows in "orders"? If yes,
and an index on that column would actually perform better (which you
could test with enable_seqscan = off), perhaps your "random_page_cost"
parameter is set too high.
Where you can certainly make a difference is the repeated scan on
"event_audit_log". An index on (request_id, event_comment_text, created_at)
should speed up that part.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
