Re: Diffrent column ordering after dump/restore tables with INHERITS - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Oleg Serov
Subject Re: Diffrent column ordering after dump/restore tables with INHERITS
Date
Msg-id cec7c6df0907060120i3c2ae605jd65337d480b40e71@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Diffrent column ordering after dump/restore tables with INHERITS  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: Diffrent column ordering after dump/restore tables with INHERITS
List pgsql-bugs
How about adding this patch to postgresql it will slove the problem?

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Greg Stark<gsstark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> when i done dump->restore i
>>> have surprise,
>>> Column ordering was changed.
>>
>> This is not a bug, it's the intended behavior.
>
> I thought that was a bug, just one that was too hard to fix for the
> problems it caused. It might be more fixable if we get around to the
> work that was discussed earlier where we separate attnum into three
> different values.
>
> Oleg: note that having the columns in the same position allows some
> optimizations in the executor so it's probably a good thing if it
> hasn't broken your application.
>
> --
> greg
> http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
>

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #4902: Subquery in VALUES referencing a CTE
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #4901: Column name "window" breaks pg_dump/pg_restore