Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vlad
Subject Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
Date
Msg-id cd70c6810801281432g2f3967a6y8cee4968fce8cff@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Pavel:

thanks for your feedback. To me plans generated by 8.2 and 8.3 are
equal and only differ by execution times. (I don't know, maybe email
wrap'ed lines, so I've attached plans to my message). Also, I confirm
that that parameter was increased (to 100) before the ran tests.

On Jan 28, 2008 4:26 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> 8.3 plan is not optimal.
>
> >    ->  Hash Join  (cost=2379.09..108954.69 rows=550548 width=52)
> > (actual time=76.188..8177.510 rows=2593557 loops=1)
>
> please, try to increase statistics
>
> default_statistics_target (in postgresql.conf) to 100 and repeat
> import and your test.
>
> Regards
> Pavel Stehule

-- Vlad

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Table has duplicate keys, what did I do