On 02.06.26 17:57, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2026-05-28 20:08:39 +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
>>> - Others have already mentioned about the potential for this to conflict
>>> with downstream uses of GH Actions. I suggest renaming the file from
>>> ci.yml to something like postgresql-ci.yml, so that there is no file
>>> naming conflict or confusion.
>>
>> Done.
>
> I find postgresql-ci.yml a bit long, how about postgres-ci.yml or pg-ci.yml?
If we're worried about length, then let's use the latter.
