On 25/09/26 05:16, Amit Langote wrote:
>> ri_CheckFunctionPermissions(riinfo, fpmeta) passes both when fpmeta
>> == riinfo->fpmeta. I'm wondering if we could just pass riinfo?
>
> That's just for consistency with build_index_scankeys(); it isn't
> needed, so I don't feel strongly either way.
>
Ok, make sense.
>> IIUC this patch only fix the case for FastPath without batching right?
>> Since batching is still on master, I'm wondering if we could also fix
>> it. See attached patch (v2-0001 is your v1-0001).
>
> I've left the batch code alone because I intend to revert it from
> master too sometime next week. Thanks for the patch, though.
>
Ok, thanks for letting me know.
> I have attached a new version where I polished
> ri_CheckFunctionPermissions()'s comment and the commit message. I
> would like to commit it tomorrow if there are no more comments.
>
Looks good to me.
--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
