On 2020-06-17 20:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> I would definitely be in favor of "nuke it now" with respect to HEAD.
> It's a bit more debatable for the back branches. However, all branches
> are going to be equally exposed to updated system tzdata trees, so
> we've typically felt that changes in the tz-related code should be
> back-patched.
It seems sensible to me to remove it in master and possibly
REL_13_STABLE, but leave it alone in the back branches.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
