Re: Protocol problem with GSSAPI encryption? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Protocol problem with GSSAPI encryption?
Date
Msg-id cc586c62-907a-9dae-8930-9b8239bbd2c0@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Protocol problem with GSSAPI encryption?  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: Protocol problem with GSSAPI encryption?  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-12-01 02:13, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> But ProcessStartupPacket assumes that the packet after a failed
> negotiation of either kind will be the actual startup packet, so the SSL
> connection request is rejected with "unsupported version 1234.5679".
> 
> I'm guessing this usually goes unnoticed because most people are
> probably not set up to do GSSAPI, and those who are are probably ok with
> using it for encryption. But if the client is set up for GSSAPI and the
> server not, then trying to do an SSL connection will fail when it should
> succeed, and PGGSSENCMODE=disable in the environment (or connect string)
> is necessary to get the connection to succeed.
> 
> It seems to me that this is a bug in ProcessStartupPacket, which should
> accept both GSS or SSL negotiation requests on a connection (in either
> order). Maybe secure_done should be two flags rather than one?

I have also seen reports of that.  I think your analysis is correct.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Using XLogFileNameP in critical section
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test