Re: Killing Processes - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Thomas F.O'Connell
Subject Re: Killing Processes
Date
Msg-id cbf589c2fd04e34b3b01281c64a0d6fa@sitening.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Killing Processes  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-admin
Oops. That's right. I was relying on memory, which is less reliable
than man. Fortunately, I always consult man before killing... :P

-tfo

--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC

Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™

http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-260-0005

On Apr 23, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 10:58:46AM -0500, Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
>>
>> It is generally not recommended that you kill processes with anything
>> stronger than HUP, which is (I believe) what kill sends by default.
>
> kill usually sends TERM by default, not HUP.
>
> (I say "usually" only because I haven't personally examined every
> implementation of kill in existence.  Every one I've used sends
> TERM by default and I haven't heard of any that work otherwise.)

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Killing Processes
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Killing Processes