Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron
Subject Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date
Msg-id cbeb3b5a-cf6c-5a73-740f-5c87905ecfdd@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
Responses Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Grigory Smolkin <g.smolkin@postgrespro.ru>)
Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Tim Clarke <tim.clarke@minerva.info>)
List pgsql-general
On 6/1/20 4:58 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
[snip]
As a developer (and part time DBA) I have a hard time thinking of any Oracle
feature that I'm missing in PostgreSQL.

The inability to do a point-in-time restoration of a single database in a multi-db cluster is a serious -- and fundamental -- missing feature (never to be implemented because of the fundamental design).

In SQL Server, it's trivial to restore -- including differentials and WAL files -- an old copy of a prod database to a different name so that you now have databases FOO and FOO_OLD in the same instance.

In Postgres, though, you've got to create a new cluster using a new port number (which in our case means sending a firewall request through channels and waiting two weeks while the RISK team approves opening the port -- and they might decline it because it's non-standard -- and then the Network team creates a change order and then implements it).

Bottom line: something I can do in an afternoon with SQL Server takes two weeks for Postgres.

This has given Postgres a big, fat black eye with our end users.

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: Using JSONB with nested key-value structures, andskipping/wildcarding the key
Next
From: Tim Clarke
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment