On 2026-05-06 We 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Attached is a patch with the fix, courtesy of claude. It's a slight
>> behaviour change:
> Yeah. So we could either do something like this, or say that the
> test case is buggy and needs to provide its own mutexes, per the
> existing comment
>
> - * if no connection in TSD for this thread, get the global default
> - * connection and hope the user knows what they're doing (i.e. using
> - * their own mutex to protect that connection from concurrent accesses
>
> On the whole I think I favor the behavior change. We might get some
> complaints, but it just seems a lot safer to redefine it like this.
I agree.
>
> Either way, it seems like some documentation adjustments are called
> for.
>
> As far as the patch itself goes, I'd be inclined to pull the
> preparatory step
>
> ecpg_pthreads_init(); /* ensure actual_connection_key is valid */
>
> into the new ecpg_default_connection() subroutine, especially since
> its proposed comment doesn't mention that prerequisite.
>
>
Right.
Given the lack of field complaints, maybe we should wait until after
next week's releases?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
