Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrei Lepikhov
Subject Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate
Date
Msg-id ca4ee281-f75b-445b-b57f-0b560067c1d7@gmail.com
Whole thread
List pgsql-hackers
On 18/08/2026 08:31, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
> On 18/08/2026 06:56, David Rowley wrote:
>> Is delaying this until v20 fine for you?
> Yes, I can do it manually in pg_catalog for now - rewriting prosupport and
> setting the dependency in the pg_depend. There’s no rush - it’s just about
> keeping things tidy.

However, I noticed that it is not documented yet.

There are also three other prosupport requests that are not documented. A quick
search showed that documentation usually depends on the author, so it makes
sense to add it now.

Since each was introduced at a different time and serves a different purpose, I
suggest we start by documenting SupportRequestSimplifyAggref, as I am more
familiar with it - see the patch in attachment.

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimize UUID parse using SIMD
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: basebackup: do not verify checksums on pages written before enabling checksums