Re: pglz performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pglz performance
Date
Msg-id c9af20cf-26e0-092c-910e-700fbd563f44@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pglz performance  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: pglz performance
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-06-24 10:44, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> 18 мая 2019 г., в 11:44, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> написал(а):
>>
> Hi! 
> Here's rebased version of patches.
> 
> Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

I think this is the most recent patch for the CF entry
<https://commitfest.postgresql.org/24/2119/>.

What about the two patches?  Which one is better?

Have you also considered using memmove() to deal with the overlap issue?

Benchmarks have been posted in this thread.  Where is the benchmarking
tool?  Should we include that in the source somehow?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: pglz performance