Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
Date
Msg-id c96ea34f-1bbc-71e8-9330-3a1ff7201627@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/10/2018 09:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... but I don't think it fixes that, because you couldn't send this new
> request without making an assumption about the server version being
> new enough to support it.  My entire beef with making server_version_num
> be GUC_REPORT is that it would encourage people to write client code that
> fails outright against older servers.  I'm afraid what you are suggesting
> will be an equally attractive nuisance.

It seems to me that is not our problem. Why do we care if some developer 
says, "I only work with 9.6"? If I am understanding your complaint.

JD

>
>             regards, tom lane
>

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes
Next
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes