Re: DRAFT 9.6 release - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
Date
Msg-id c8ab4593-eb90-5198-6cd7-fb354ad9b72b@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to DRAFT 9.6 release  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: DRAFT 9.6 release  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 08/30/2016 06:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> ??? It's always been possible for me to give multiple standbys the same
>> name, making a de-facto group.
>
> A "group" grammar, by that I mean an alias referring to a set of
> nodes, is not supported. And you can still define multiple entries
> with the same name.
>

Yeah, so what happens in the case I described?  Is the master just
looking for that number of commits, or is it looking for a commit from
g1 and from g2?

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release