Re: portal pinning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: portal pinning
Date
Msg-id c896387b-5690-2c27-311d-730c861130ff@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: portal pinning  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: portal pinning
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/8/18 20:28, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/8/18 15:27, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> This seems like a good idea, and the code change is tiny and clean. I
>> don't know of any third party PLs or other libraries might be pinning
>> the portals already on their own. How would they be affected if they did?
> 
> They would get an error if they tried to pin it a second time.  So this
> would require a small source-level adjustment.  But I doubt this is
> actually the case anywhere, seeing that we are not even using this
> consistently in core.

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY