Re: SAN performance mystery - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From John Vincent
Subject Re: SAN performance mystery
Date
Msg-id c841561b0606190558r693b18c6rfbf2d688cf9d5d92@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SAN performance mystery  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-performance




I'd have to agree with you about the specific SAN/setup you're working
with there.  I certainly disagree that it's a general property of SAN's
though.  We've got a DS4300 with FC controllers and drives, hosts are
generally dual-controller load-balanced and it works quite decently.

How are you guys doing the load balancing? IIRC, the RDAC driver only does failover. Or are you using the OS level multipathing instead? While we were on the 4300 for our AIX boxes, we just created two big RAID5 LUNs and assigned one to each controller. With 2 HBAs and LVM stripping that was about the best we could get in terms of load balancing.

Indeed, the EMC SANs are generally the high-priced ones too, so not
really sure what to tell you about the poor performance you're seeing
out of it.  Your IT folks and/or your EMC rep. should be able to resolve
that, really...

The only exception I've heard to this is the Clarion AX150. We looked at one and we were warned off of it by some EMC gearheads.

        Enjoy,

                Stephen


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFElpuRrzgMPqB3kigRAuo8AJ9vlxRK7VPMb9rN7AFm/qMNHLbdBwCfZiih
ZHApIcDhhj/J/Es9KPXEl/s=
=25MX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Next
From: Peter Wilson
Date:
Subject: Poor performance - fixed by restart