On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is
> not *only* a list of names anymore.
>
> synchronous_standby_config?
> synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)?
If the existing values are still going to be accepted, then I would
leave it as is.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services