[HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check
Date
Msg-id c8089bcd-e5f9-3a05-136a-f183207bb5f9@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
AFAICT, unlike the pg_regress checks, which in the installcheck case run
against a running instance of postgres, for TAP tests the only
difference is that that for the check case a temp install is done,
possibly with some extra contrib modules. Is that correct? If is is, why
aren't we providing an installcheck target for tests like recover. In at
least one case (buildfarmn jacana) installs are quite expensive (2 or 3
minutes) and if they are pointless as seems to be the case here why
can't we just avoid them?


cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] valgrind error in subscription code
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders