On 2026-04-15 We 12:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 2026-04-15 We 10:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The OpenBSD members of the buildfarm don't seem to like this.
>> Ugh.
>> I'm will take a look later today.
> I reproduced it locally on OpenBSD 7.7. HAVE_SA_SIGINFO is defined,
> and the code to grab the pid/uid out of siginfo_t is definitely
> getting compiled. As best I can tell, the kernel is simply passing
> zero for info->si_pid and si_uid. This does not match up with the
> info available on the net, so I'm not sure what the issue is.
>
> Some googling suggested that on some platforms si_pid will be zero
> if the process signaled itself, but I can eliminate that theory:
> it's still zero if I do the pg_terminate_backend() from another
> session.
>
> As a short-term fix, we could just go back to allowing the regex to
> consider the match optional.
>
>
Ok, so we can get the buildfarm green I'll go and do that. But I think
we should have an open item to tighten the test.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com