On 6/14/19 2:13 PM, Ron wrote:
> On 6/14/19 2:55 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
>> Is reindex table redundant after vacuum(analyse,verbose)?
>
> Instead of "redundant", I'd call it "backwards", since doing a
> vacuum(analyse,verbose) on a freshly reindexed table seems more fruitful.
>
Does reindex remove (dead) row versions as vacuum does (in the
indices)? Maybe I don't need reindex at all as I do NOT suspect any
corruption - was just rebuilding after having removed 15M data rows in
vacuum
