Re: pg_type.h regression? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: pg_type.h regression?
Date
Msg-id c71349f24c56116edba6417fee7dbec4@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_type.h regression?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_type.h regression?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

>> [ scratches head... ]  I seem to have done that in rev 1.198, but I
>> don't recall why.  It's late here though ...

> I think my reasoning was that all array types should have typdelim = ','
> for consistency.  It doesn't actually matter because nothing looks at
> the value ... the element type's delimiter is what array_in/out use.

Ah, okay, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation, I'll tweak
my code to do it the right way by looking at the base type.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809230934
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkjY8GIACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiOxgCgmpuxlkzQYlJNCdNCGc7houn7
hwQAoKfyLX3t5ArtEzaytD+nWOCl/br1
=QNIJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial prefetch performance testing
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch