Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date
Msg-id c5953b36-a81a-156f-f211-4a54dc8a348d@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/28/16 2:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I am sorry, I disagree. Proposed form is hard readable. Is not possible to
>> > simply copy/paste.
> Why do you care?  You can use \sf if you want to copy&paste the
> function code.
>
>> > I cannot to imagine any use case for proposed format.
> My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+
> altogether.  I stand by that.  People who are used to seeing the output
> in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it
> out, at which point it's no longer a problem.  We're not breaking
> anyone's scripts, that's for sure.
>
> If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to
> footers.  I'm -1 on doing nothing.

I agree with everything Alvaro just said.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)   mobile: 512-569-9461



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: sloppy handling of pointers
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Show hash / bitmap sizes in EXPLAIN ANALYZE?