Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pglz performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pglz performance
Date
Msg-id c52bb971-ae60-81eb-be66-57f12d3ae102@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pglz performance  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pglz performance  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2019-11-26 10:43, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> In general, I think the results for both patches seem clearly a win, but
> maybe patch 1 is  bit better, especially on the newer (xeon) CPU. So I'd
> probably go with that one.

Patch 1 is also the simpler patch, so it seems clearly preferable.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum