-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Tom Lane replied:
>>> Come on, really? Note that the above example works without casts if
>>> you use int *or* bigint *or* numeric, but not smallint. That could be
>>> fixed by causing sufficiently-small integers to lex as smallints,
>> Is there any general interest in adjusting smallint casting?
...
> It's conceivable that a change in the lexer behavior combined with a
> massive reorganization of the integer-related operators would bring us
> to a nicer place than where we are now. But it'd be a lot of work for
> dubious reward, and it would almost certainly generate a pile of
> application compatibility problems.
Okay, but what about a more targeted solution to the original
poster's problem? That seems doable without causing major
breakage elsewhere....
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201208271818
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAlA78m0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSshW2gCg1Xcx5zLORMIDQo2yE6QTLVuD
P88AniE9rh4Dojg0o416cWK7cYHWaq0b
=NOAR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
