Re: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replication
Date
Msg-id c46df4ab-ac96-0c3e-fb48-1670d44d1a97@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replication  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replication  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-02-27 11:13, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Btw., I think the current setup is slightly buggy.  The MaxBackends value that is used to size shared memory is
computedas MaxConnections + autovacuum_max_workers + 1 + max_worker_processes + max_wal_senders, but we don't track
autovacuum_max_workersin WAL.
 
> Maybe this is because autovacuum doesn't work during recovery?

Autovacuum on the primary can use locks or xids, and so it's possible 
that the standby when processing WAL encounters more of those than it 
has locally allocated shared memory to handle.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: legrand legrand
Date:
Subject: Re: Using stat collector for collecting long SQL
Next
From: Alexey Kondratov
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command fromrecovery.conf or command line