-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> But when you are dealing with hand-entered input, you *do not know* what
> the user meant by input such as '01/03/2003'. You may think you know,
> but you're just fooling yourself.
I agree with this, but the actual test case someone posted was:
2003-13-03
2003-03-13
Parsing these both as the same date just seems fundamentally wrong in my
opinion. Besides, although MM-DD-YYYY and DD-MM-YYYY are both rather
common, YYYY-MM-DD is much more common than YYYY-DD-MM. I really think
it should throw an error if it does not fit into YYYY-MM-DD.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200306191110
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE+8dMSvJuQZxSWSsgRAiaYAKDrZMWBy7pv81BjCeSzMdbyTsu3eQCg9exM
vXj4GEQRhckbz2ygBmkX8z4=
=WtaY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
