Re: Postgresql apt repository naming scheme question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: Postgresql apt repository naming scheme question
Date
Msg-id c2e18e1f-9362-809b-6a81-7ebfb2b170c6@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgresql apt repository naming scheme question  (Jacob Scott <jacob.scott@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 10/18/2016 11:12 AM, Jacob Scott wrote:
> Is it safe/recommended to use the latest released libpq-dev package
> rather than one which matches the major version of the serrver/client
> packages being installed? Or should I be manually using the morgue as
> described in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160731194944.amiwidhsoqh4osac%40msg.df7cb.de
> ? I feel like I may be missing some key difference between -dev and
> non -dev packages.

the latest libpq library should function with any postgres server going
pretty far back, like 7.x


--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unnest an array in postgresql
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: out-of-order XID insertion in KnownAssignedXids