Re: ignore_killed_tuples is always true - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: ignore_killed_tuples is always true
Date
Msg-id c2d9e70e0602102131y5566939cwfaf8e954aba9457a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ignore_killed_tuples is always true  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ignore_killed_tuples is always true  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On 2/10/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> > I found IndexScanDesc->ignore_killed_tuples is always true.
> > Is this still needed?
>
> What is the point of removing it?  You cannot argue that saving
> one if-test per tuple is a worthwhile speedup.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

to clean code?

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib/xinetops for 8.1 "patch"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ignore_killed_tuples is always true