On 11/11/05, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
> > MERGE seems to me the better option... not just because is standard
> > but at least i can see some use cases for it...
>
> I don't think you understand my message: MERGE does not do what REPLACE
> does.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
>
I understand you well... what i was trying to say is that i prefer
MERGE (standard SQL command) to be done because the functionally it
has (basically a merge of two tables) seems to me to be more usefull
than REPLACE (MySql Command)...
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)
