Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU
Date
Msg-id c28a28f9-94d3-9708-8ab6-e11190ac82a6@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU  (Victor Wagner <vitus@wagner.pp.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU  (Victor Wagner <vitus@wagner.pp.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 8/1/17 02:12, Victor Wagner wrote:
>> We are only calling uloc_toLanguageTag() with keyword/value
>> combinations that ICU itself previously told us were supported.  So
>> just ignoring errors doesn't seem proper in this case.
>>
> We know that this version of ICU is broken. But what choice we have?

I don't know that we can already reach that conclusion.  Maybe the APIs
have changed or we are not using them correctly.  Are there any bug
reports or changelog entries related to this?  I don't think we should
just give up and ignore errors.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Next
From: Victor Wagner
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU