On 05.12.20 03:22, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 02:34:26PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2020-12-02 15:04, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> I do wonder if it'd be a good idea to move the syscall
>>> name itself out of the message, too; that would reduce the number of
>>> messages to translate 50x to just "%s(%s) failed: %m" instead of one
>>> message per distinct syscall.
>>
>> Seems useful, but perhaps as a separate project.
>
> - elog(LOG, "getsockname() failed: %m");
> + ereport(LOG,
> + (errmsg("getsockname() failed: %m")));
> FWIW, I disagree with the approach taken by eb93f3a. As of HEAD, it
> is now required to translate all those strings. I think that it would
> have been better to remove the function names from all those error
> messages and not require the same pattern to be translated N times.
I made another pass across this and implemented the requested change.