Re: Functions have 32 args limt ??? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ivar
Subject Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???
Date
Msg-id bik4l8$ne2$1@sea.gmane.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Functions have 32 args limt ???  ("Ivar" <ivar@lumisoft.ee>)
Responses Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???  (merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz))
Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???  (Dennis Gearon <gearond@fireserve.net>)
Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-general
I don't see why default is so small.

"Joe Conway" <mail@joeconway.com> wrote in message
news:3F4D8DE0.1060307@joeconway.com...
> Ivar wrote:
> > For my supprise I found that functions have 32 parameter limit.
> >
> > Where to find more info about this limitation or similar limitations ?
> >
> > I need at least 50, 100 would be ok.
>
> See INDEX_MAX_KEYS defined in src/include/pg_config.h.in
> (pg_config_manual.h in postgres 7.4). Change to 64 or whatever and
> recompile. But note that you'll need to dump, initdb, and reload your
> data. Also note that there are performance and disk usage tradeoffs --
> search the mailing list archives from August 2002 for some test results
> and discussion.
>
> Joe
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match
>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: The ..... worm
Next
From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Date:
Subject: Re: Functions have 32 args limt ???