On 2018/08/23 13:09, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> On Aug 22, 2018, at 9:12 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> Below is a copy of the press release draft:
>>
>> About the following:
>>
>> "PostgreSQL 11 also supports partitioned tables that utilize the
>> PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper,
>> [postgres_fdw](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/postgres-fdw.html
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/postgres-fdw.html>),
>> enabling users to combine partitioning with data federation techniques."
>>
>> Just to clarify, we support partitioned tables containing partitions that
>> utilize FDWs even in PostgreSQL 10 [1]. Although, they were not handled
>> by tuple routing, so offered limited functionality as partitions.
>> PostgreSQL 11 fixed that limitation, which makes them more useful.
>
> Thanks for the clarification! Would something like “PostgreSQL 11 _provides better
> support for_…” work better?
Maybe, "PostgreSQL 11 enhances the foreign partition functionality offered
via its PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper [postgres_fdw] ..."?
Thanks,
Amit
