Re: Dumping/restoring fails on inherited generated column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Dumping/restoring fails on inherited generated column
Date
Msg-id bf846641-b695-d095-f3d1-f362d58c7296@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Dumping/restoring fails on inherited generated column  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Dumping/restoring fails on inherited generated column
Re: Dumping/restoring fails on inherited generated column
Re: Dumping/restoring fails on inherited generated column
Re: Dumping/restoring fails on inherited generated column
List pgsql-hackers
I have been analyzing this issue again.  We have a few candidate patches 
that do very similar things for avoiding dumping the generation 
expression of table gtest1_1.  We can figure out later which one of 
these we like best.  But there is another issue lurking nearby.  The 
table hierarchy of gtest30, which is created in the regression tests 
like this:

CREATE TABLE gtest30 (
     a int,
     b int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a * 2) STORED
);
CREATE TABLE gtest30_1 () INHERITS (gtest30);
ALTER TABLE ONLY gtest30 ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION;

This drops the generation expression from the parent table but not the 
child table.  This is currently dumped like this:

CREATE TABLE public.gtest30 (
     a integer,
     b integer
);

CREATE TABLE public.gtest30_1 (
)
INHERITS (public.gtest30);

ALTER TABLE ONLY public.gtest30_1 ALTER COLUMN b SET DEFAULT (a * 2);

The proposed patches will cause the last statement to be omitted, but 
that still won't recreate the original state.  The problem is that there 
is no command to make a column generated afterwards, like the SET 
DEFAULT command, so we can't dump it like this.  We would have to produce

CREATE TABLE public.gtest30 (
     a integer,
     b integer
);

CREATE TABLE public.gtest30_1 (
     b integer GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a * 2) STORED
)
INHERITS (public.gtest30);

but this will create the column "b" of gtest30_1 as attlocal, which the 
original command sequence does not.

We could probably fix this by having ALTER TABLE ONLY / DROP EXPRESSION 
update the attlocal column of direct children to true, to make the 
catalog state look like something that can be restored.  However, that's 
a fair amount of complicated code, so for now I propose to just prohibit 
this command, meaning you can't use ONLY in this command if there are 
children.  This is new in PG13, so this change would have very limited 
impact in practice.

Proposed patch attached.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature improvement for FETCH tab completion
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)