Re: Built-in connection pooling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Konstantin Knizhnik
Subject Re: Built-in connection pooling
Date
Msg-id be5978ba-445f-abb3-ee5e-5272bcd2a968@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Built-in connection pooling
List pgsql-hackers

On 18.01.2018 18:02, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> On 01/18/2018 03:48 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>> On 17.01.2018 19:09, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>>> Hi hackers,
>>>
>>> ...
> I haven't looked at the code yet, but after reading your message I have
> a simple question - gow iss this going to work with SSL? If you're only
> passing a file descriptor, that does not seem to be sufficient for the
> backends to do crypto (that requires the SSL stuff from Port).
>
> Maybe I'm missing something and it already works, though ...
>
>
> regards
>
Ooops, I missed this aspect with SSL. Thank you.
New version of the patch which correctly maintain session context is 
attached.
Now each session has its own allocator which should be  used instead of 
TopMemoryAllocator.
SSL connections work now.

-- 
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Useless code in ExecInitModifyTable
Next
From: Yoshimi Ichiyanagi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory