Re: PostgreSQL licence - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: PostgreSQL licence
Date
Msg-id bddc86151002020612q7a9ffd51tc4c7eb2c97df41af@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL licence  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL licence  (Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@notorand.it>)
List pgsql-general
2010/2/2 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 13:09 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>
> Could someone clarify, is this guy indeed correct and the licence page
> needs updating stating it's something similar to an MIT licence, or is
> he just plain wrong?  As it stands, the Wikipedia page on PostgreSQL
> says "similar to the MIT License".

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1256509037.7432.10.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org



I take it you're staying the licence page needs updating?  Maybe some licence clarification should coincide with v9?

Thom

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Clemens Schwaighofer
Date:
Subject: Problem with partition tables and schemas
Next
From: Vincenzo Romano
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL licence