Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> writes: > Oh, I see. Yes, that is different. In which case, I'd still like to > see such a feature implemented as I imagine it could be useful for > auto-killing connections not being used that are continuously taking > some of the resources.
Did you try pgbouncer yet? -- dim
I've only been using the bare-bones Postgres setup. And you're right, connection pooling would be a good substitute, so I'll look into setting that up. Thanks Dimitri.
